🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

In Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is granted. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," commented one parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the regional government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of these regions, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this international debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.